the middle of the Sea of Japan / East Sea between Korea and Japan, there is a pile of pebbles, 2 larger than others. Their total area does not exceed 0.2 square kilometers, or one tenth of Monaco. Or 1.5 times the temple 清水寺 Kiyomizu-dera Kyoto and its little park.
The Liancourt Rocks are , named after the French whaling (indeed, what he was doing there?) who has "rediscovered" it is sinking almost 1849.
These three stones are called unnecessary 독도 Dokdo by Koreans and 竹 岛 Takeshima by the Japanese. Currently, there are 2 old Koreans on the island, paid by their government, but in fact the two countries dispute the sovereignty. There was a discussion here with elements to give his opinion.
In short, Koreans have evidence that they had almost the islands for a very long time. But have never declared their sovereignty from the international community. There are some discussions about the islands between the two countries in 1877, the Japanese say that these islands do not belong to them. But by 1900, a Japanese claim to regularly use the archipelago fish, and the Japanese government, rogue, the annex on the grounds that it is still one (terra nullius ). Koreans naturally begin to protest but somehow Japan began its expansionist and annex all of Korea in 1910. Then Japan will annex much of Southeast Asia, until Pearl Harbor, and once lost the Second World War, the U.S. lay a treaty that gives the Japanese site with their borders as they are currently experiencing. Except that the treaty fails to mention what happens to these three stones. The dispute may then resume with Korea.
Except this time, Japan supported the American occupation and build a case of bad faith as this, among other things, the Koreans have set foot in Liancourt before 1900 because they had boats all rotten. Arguments against easily-attacked, but the U.S. Air Force from Okinawa, bombarding the island in an "exercise" and kill the Koreans who were fishing in the waters. Koreans do not allow themselves to do and come charging back with a scientific mission, it also probably secretly bombed by the same U.S. Air Force. Koreans do not ever let go, and seeing that, Americans are realizing that it is not in their interest to get back to Korea, and change sides. They then declare that Liancourt is part of Korean territory. Rajoutent and that the dispute between Korea and Japan do not look at them, and they act more from now, 1952. It's true after all, he had nothing to fear from the Japanese that they were already.
Korea 2 times refuse to discuss it at the court of international justice and the situation remains the same in 2009 and registered as Liancourt Korea's ownership of United States Board on Geographic Names.
As the possession of an island also gives the right to use the Marine perimeter, there are probably some stuff under water pump for that little squabble back in the news regularly. Or at least it is for fishing area. Or maybe it's just incredible pride of the Japanese and Koreans who push them to continue fighting. Recently, the Korean coast guard fired on Japanese visitors. They even organize tourism on these three stones. And burned tires outside the Embassy of Japan when Japanese Prime Minister referred to the disputed islands. More than Good relations between the two enemy countries, what is more important and "justifies" these arguments?
In short, Koreans have evidence that they had almost the islands for a very long time. But have never declared their sovereignty from the international community. There are some discussions about the islands between the two countries in 1877, the Japanese say that these islands do not belong to them. But by 1900, a Japanese claim to regularly use the archipelago fish, and the Japanese government, rogue, the annex on the grounds that it is still one (terra nullius ). Koreans naturally begin to protest but somehow Japan began its expansionist and annex all of Korea in 1910. Then Japan will annex much of Southeast Asia, until Pearl Harbor, and once lost the Second World War, the U.S. lay a treaty that gives the Japanese site with their borders as they are currently experiencing. Except that the treaty fails to mention what happens to these three stones. The dispute may then resume with Korea.
On Flight Korean Air Osaka - Seoul, the map displays airports and major cities in Dokdo Liancourt
Except this time, Japan supported the American occupation and build a case of bad faith as this, among other things, the Koreans have set foot in Liancourt before 1900 because they had boats all rotten. Arguments against easily-attacked, but the U.S. Air Force from Okinawa, bombarding the island in an "exercise" and kill the Koreans who were fishing in the waters. Koreans do not allow themselves to do and come charging back with a scientific mission, it also probably secretly bombed by the same U.S. Air Force. Koreans do not ever let go, and seeing that, Americans are realizing that it is not in their interest to get back to Korea, and change sides. They then declare that Liancourt is part of Korean territory. Rajoutent and that the dispute between Korea and Japan do not look at them, and they act more from now, 1952. It's true after all, he had nothing to fear from the Japanese that they were already.
Korea 2 times refuse to discuss it at the court of international justice and the situation remains the same in 2009 and registered as Liancourt Korea's ownership of United States Board on Geographic Names.
On Korean Air flight Melbourne - Seoul, the map still shows the tiny Dokdo ...
As the possession of an island also gives the right to use the Marine perimeter, there are probably some stuff under water pump for that little squabble back in the news regularly. Or at least it is for fishing area. Or maybe it's just incredible pride of the Japanese and Koreans who push them to continue fighting. Recently, the Korean coast guard fired on Japanese visitors. They even organize tourism on these three stones. And burned tires outside the Embassy of Japan when Japanese Prime Minister referred to the disputed islands. More than Good relations between the two enemy countries, what is more important and "justifies" these arguments?
- A - gas deposits
- B - fishing
- C - pride
- D - D response
The question of the next tier discuss the Kuril islands claimed by Japan and his disputes with Russia. The 50/50 will be operated by the U.S. Navy and call a friend to all possible Chinese numbers. And the audience will consist of ExxonMobil, Shell and BP.
0 comments:
Post a Comment